TSTP Solution File: NUM663^1 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : NUM663^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 13:54:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_nat,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(ty_z,type,
z: nat ).
thf(ty_y,type,
y: nat ).
thf(ty_less,type,
less: nat > nat > $o ).
thf(ty_x,type,
x: nat ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> ( z = z ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
( ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( ( less @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( less @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> ! [X1: nat] :
( ( less @ x @ y )
=> ( ( less @ y @ X1 )
=> ( less @ x @ X1 ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(sP4,plain,
( sP4
<=> ( less @ x @ y ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).
thf(sP5,plain,
( sP5
<=> ( y = x ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).
thf(sP6,plain,
( sP6
<=> ( sP4
=> ( ( less @ y @ z )
=> ( less @ x @ z ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).
thf(sP7,plain,
( sP7
<=> ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( less @ x @ X1 )
=> ( ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( less @ x @ X2 ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).
thf(sP8,plain,
( sP8
<=> ( ( x = y )
=> sP5 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).
thf(sP9,plain,
( sP9
<=> ( less @ x @ z ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).
thf(sP10,plain,
( sP10
<=> ( ( less @ y @ z )
=> sP9 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).
thf(sP11,plain,
( sP11
<=> ( x = y ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).
thf(sP12,plain,
( sP12
<=> ! [X1: nat] :
( ( x = X1 )
=> ( X1 = x ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).
thf(sP13,plain,
( sP13
<=> ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ( X2 = X1 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])]) ).
thf(sP14,plain,
( sP14
<=> ( less @ y @ z ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])]) ).
thf(satz16a,conjecture,
sP9 ).
thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
~ sP9,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz16a]) ).
thf(h1,assumption,
sP4,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h2,assumption,
sP11,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(1,plain,
( ~ sP2
| sP7 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(2,plain,
( ~ sP7
| sP3 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( ~ sP3
| sP6 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ~ sP6
| ~ sP4
| sP10 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ~ sP10
| ~ sP14
| sP9 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(k,axiom,
sP14 ).
thf(satz15,axiom,
sP2 ).
thf(6,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,h1,k,satz15,h0]) ).
thf(7,plain,
sP1,
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ~ sP14
| sP9
| ~ sP5
| ~ sP1 ),
inference(mating_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ~ sP8
| ~ sP11
| sP5 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ~ sP12
| sP8 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ~ sP13
| sP12 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(12,plain,
sP13,
inference(eq_sym,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(13,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h0])],[7,8,9,10,11,12,h2,k,h0]) ).
thf(l,axiom,
( ~ sP4
=> sP11 ) ).
thf(14,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h1]),tab_imp(discharge,[h2])],[l,6,13,h1,h2]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
sP9,
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[14,h0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM663^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 15:32:12 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46 % Mode: mode213
% 0.19/0.46 % Inferences: 1463
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------